Contents |
Chapter I |
Introductory |
|
Proposal to Constitute Environment Courts |
|
In this context, several important questions arise for consideration |
Chapter II |
Uncertainty of Science and Problems of Environmental Courts |
|
Uncertainty of Science and Problems of Environmental Courts |
|
The reason for scientific inaccuracies can be summarized as follows |
Chapter III |
The Constitutional Mandate and Survey of Supreme Court's Judgments on Environmental Issues |
|
The Constitutional Mandate and Survey of Supreme Court's Judgments on Environmental Issues |
|
Constitutional provisions |
|
Judgments of the Supreme Court |
|
The Supreme Court then referred to the Stockholm Declaration of 1972 |
|
The Supreme Court observed |
|
The Court further observed |
|
Summary |
Chapter IV |
Environmental Courts in other Countries |
|
Environmental Courts in other Countries |
|
Australia |
|
Section 12 further states as follows |
|
Section 23 refers to 'making of orders' and reads as follows |
|
New Zealand |
|
The Environment Court's work includes |
|
United Kingdom |
|
As to the jurisdiction and powers of the Environmental Courts, the Royal Commission stated |
|
Canada, Europe and USA |
Chapter V |
Environmental Courts or Appellate Environment Bodies in India as at Present |
|
General jurisdiction of various civil, criminal and constitutional Courts |
|
Special Acts and appellate powers |
|
Water (P&CP) Act, 1974 and Rules made thereunder |
|
Summary of the appeal provisions in the above Acts and Rules |
Chapter VI |
Two other statutory Environmental Tribunals and Defects therein |
|
National Environment Tribunal Act, 1995 |
|
The National Environmental Appellate Authority Act, 1997 |
Chapter VII |
Can a law made by Parliament under Article 252 (like the Water (P&CP) Act, 1974), be amended by Parliament under a law made under Article 253? |
|
What is the purpose of Article 247? |
|
Entry 13 of List I of Schedule VII reads as follow |
|
Two proposals can be considered here |
|
Article 253 and special law for Environment Courts |
|
Article 247 reads as follows |
|
Right of Appeal to Supreme Court |
Chapter VIII |
Environmental Courts to follow certain fundamental principles |
|
Polluter Pays Principle |
|
National laws in Belgium, France, Germany have adverted to this principle |
|
Hazardous substance |
|
Precautionary Principle |
|
The Principle of Prevention |
|
Principle of New Burden of Proof |
|
Sustainable Development |
|
Everyone has the righ |
|
Public trust doctrine |
|
Inter-generational equity |
Chapter IX |
Proposals for Environmental Courts in India |
|
Proposals for Environmental Courts in India |
|
Appellate Jurisdiction |
|
Original Jurisdiction |
|
Jurisdiction of ordinary Civil Court and conflict of decisions |
|
Rules of evidence and Conciliation/Mediation |
|
Environmental Principles to be applied |
|
Repeal of the National Environmental Tribunal Act, 1995 and the National Environment Appellate Tribunal Act, 1997 |
|
Power to frame schemes and monitor them |
|
Execution of orders and contempt procedure |
|
Power to mould appropriate relief |
|
Locus standi and Amicus curiae |
|
Qualification of Judicial Members |
|
Qualification of Commissioners |
|
Criminal and judicial review jurisdiction kept out |
|
Appeal to Supreme Court |
|
Method of appointment and other matters |
|
Appeals to Supreme Court will persuade High Court not to interfere normally on the principle of 'alternative effective remedy' |
Chapter X |
Recommendations |
|
On the basis of our discussion in previous chapters, we recommend the following, namely |