
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Report No. 273 Implementation of 'United Nations Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment' through Legislation 1 Goerge Ryley Scott, "The History of Torture Throughout the Ages", 1940 (T. Werner Laurie Ltd., London) 2 In Re: Ramlila Maidan Incident, 2012 (5) SCC 1 3 Translated into English by R Shamasastry; Chapter VIII, Book IV; Available at: https://ia802703.us.archive.org/13/items/Arthasastra_English_Translation/ Arthashastra_of_Chanakya_-_English.pdf; last viewed on 23 August 2017. 4 Khandekar, Indrajit, Pawar, Vishwajeet & Ors, "Torture Leading to Suicide: A case Report" 31(2) JIAFM 152. 5 Curtice, Martin, "Article 3 of the Human Rights Act 1988: implications for clinical practice" 14 APT 389 (2008). 6 http://listovative.com/top-10-historys-worst-torture-methods/ 7 AIR 1997 SC 610 8 John H. Langbein: Torture and the Law of Proof, 1977, University of Chicago Press 9 see A and others (Appellants) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004]: para. 412 10 Alfred McCoy: A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror (New York 2006) University of Wisconsin - Madison News 11 W.P. (Civil) No. 738 of 2016; In September 2016, the Supreme Court had issued notice to the Central Government on the PIL. 12 In Soering v. UK, Application (07/07/1989), the European Court of Human Rights held that extraditing a person from UK to Virginia- a state in US that imposes death penalty, would violate Article 3 of the Torture Convention. 13 Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others, Ex Parte Pinochet; R v. Evans and Another and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others, Ex Parte Pinochet, R v. [1999] UKHL 17 (24th March, 1999). 14 (2014) 3 SCC 1. 15 International Justice Resource Centre [I J R C] 16 Geneva Conventions, available at: 17 Wet, Erika, de, "The Prohibition of Torture as an international norm of jus cogens and its implications for national and customary law" 15 EJIL 97-121 (2004). 18 Enforced disappearance, Torture and arbitrary detention, available at: 19 Torture, available at: http://www.ijrcenter.org/thematic-research-guides/torture/ (visited on 26-10-2017). 20 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, available at: http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/catcidtp/catcidtp.html (visited on 26-10-2017). 21 Ibid. 22 Supra note 20. 23 Third Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August, 1949 24 Supra note 19. 25 Code of Federal Regulations: Aliens and Nationality, U.S. General Services Administration, National Archives and Records Service, Office of the Federal Register, 2009 at p. 178 26 Torture in UK Law, available at: https://justice.org.uk/torture-uk-law/ (visited on 26-10-2017). 27 Ibid. 28 See: Prosecutor v Furundzija [1998] ICTY 3, 10 December 1998, paragraphs 147-157 29 See: Saifi v. Brixton Prison, [2001] 4 All ER 168. 30 United Nations Convention Against Torture, and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, available at: 2017). 31 Ibid. 32 Ibid. 33 Vide: Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466 (2004); Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004); Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006); Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2008) 34 Available at 35 Burdov v. Russia, ECHR, IHRL 181 (ECHR 2009). 36 Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russia, 57942/00; 57945/00, Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights, 19 December 2002, available at: 37 See also, Kalashnikov v. Russia, 47095/99, Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights, 15 July 2002, available at: http://www.refworld.org/cases, ECHR,416bb0d44.html; 38 China: Tell the Truth on Torture at UN Review, available at: 39 France and the Fight against enforced disappearance, torture and arbitrary detention, available at: 40 Ibid. 41 Wainwright v. United Kingdom, Application no. 12350/04 (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 40. 42 Application No. 5320/71 (1978). See also: Labita v. Italy, Application No. 26772/95, Judgment of 6 April 2000, Selmouni v. France, Application No. 25803/94, Judgment of 28 July 1999 and Chahal v. The United Kingdom, Application No. 22414/93, Judgment of 15 November 1996). 43 See Askoy v. Turkey, 1996-VI Eur. Ct. H.R. 2260, Aydin v. Turkey, 1997-V Eur. Ct. H.R. 1866, 1873-74, 1891, and Selmouni v. France, Application No. 25803/94, Judgment of 28 July 1999 (each finding that the treatment endured by the applicants amounted to torture). 44 Selmouni v. France, Application No. 25803/94, Judgment of 28 July 1999. 45 Soering v. The United Kingdom, Application No. 25803/94, Judgment of 28 July 1999. For other cases involving the inflicting of mental, but not physical violence, see V. v. The United Kingdom, Application No. 24888/94, Judgment of 16 December 1999 and X and Y v. The Netherlands, Application No. 8978/80, Judgment of 26 March 1985. 46 See Malawi African Association and Others v. Mauritania, African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, Comm. Nos. 54/91, 61/91, 98/93, 164/97 à 196/97 and 210/98 (2000). 47 (1/A Court H.R. Judgment of August 18, 2000, Ser. C No. 69. (2000) IACHR6. See also Maritza Urrutia v. Guatemala, Judgment of November 27, 2003, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R., (Ser. C) No. 103 (2003), finding that the victim suffered physical violence amounting to torture, and mental violence constituting cruel and inhuman treatment. 48 See: Quinteros v. Uruguay, Human Rights Committee Communication No. 107/1981, Views of 21 July 1983; Case of the 'Street Children' (Villagran-Morales) et al. v. Guatemala, Inter-Am. Ct H.R., 19 November 1999; Laureano v. Peru, Communication No. 540/1993, Views of 25 March 1996; Kurt v. Turkey, Appl. No. 15/1997/799/1002, Judgment of 25 May 1998. In Çakici v. Turkey, Application No. 23657/94, Judgment of 8 July 1999, paragraphs 98-99). 49 Osbourne v. Jamaica, Communication No. 759/1997, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/68/D/759/1997 (2000). 50 Curtis Francis Doebbler v. Sudan, African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, Comm. No. 236/2000 (2003). 51 Communication No. 265/1987, U.N. Doc. Supp. No. 40 (A/44/40) at 311 (1989). 52 Communication No. 577/1994 (1997). See also Loayza Tamayo Case, Reparations, Judgment of November 27, 1998, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. C) No. 42 (1998) (finding similar treatment violated the applicants' rights under the American Convention). 53 Comm. Nos. 137/94, 139/94, 154/96 and 161/97 (1998). 54 Yavuz v. Turkey Application no. 32577/02, Judgment of 29 September 2008. 55 Ireland v. The United Kingdom [1978]2 EHRR 25 56 Kudla v. Poland, (2000) Application No.30210/96, 26th October 2000. 57 Ibid 58 Keenan v. UK, (2001) 33 EHRR 913. 59 Hurtado v. Switzerland (1994) Application No.1754/90, 28th January; See also: Khudobin v. Russia, application no. 59696/00), 26th October, 2006; and Pretty v. UK, (2002) 35 EHRR 1 60 See Herczegfalvy v. Austria[1992]; Aerts v. Belgium [1998]. 61 Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine (2005) Application No.54825/00, 5th April 62 See Saifi v. Brixton Prison & Anor, Supra Note 29 63 Arvinder Singh Bagga v. State of U.P, AIR 1995 SC 117 64 See: Speech by Dr. Justice A S Anand, former Chief Justice of India, in VIIIth International Symposium on Torture, (1999) 7 SCC 10 (J). 65 AIR 2012 SC 2573 66 1995(4) SCC 262 67 Yogendra Kumar Jaiswal & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Ors., AIR 2016 SC 1474 68 Smt. Selvi v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2010 SC 1974. See also Raja Narainlalbansilal v. Maneck Phiroz Mistry, AIR 1961 SC 29; and Charoria v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1968 SC 938 69 See: State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad, AIR 1961 SC 1808; and Smt. Selvi & Ors. v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2010 SC 1974 70 Sampat Prakash v. State of J&K AIR 1969 SC 1153; and Kamla Kanhaihalal Kushalani v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1981 SC 814 71 AIR 1978 SC 1675; See also Sunil Batra (II) v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1980 SC 1579; and In Re: Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons, AIR 2016 SCC 993. 72 Nahar Singh Yadav v. Union of India, AIR 2011 SC 1549 73 Inderjit v. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1979 SC 1867 74 A K Gopalan v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 27; and Hansmukh v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1981 SC 28. 75 A K Gopalan, supra, and State of Madhya Pradesh v. Shobharam AIR 1966 SC 1910 76 State of Uttar Pradesh v. Abdul Samad, AIR 1962 SC 1506 77 Ram Singh v. Central Bureau of Narcotics, AIR 2011 SC 2490 78 AIR 1966 SC 119 79 Smt. Selvi v. State of Karnataka (Supra note 54) 80 Mohmed Inayatullah v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1976 SC 480 81 Supra Note 54 82 AIR 2015 SC 1816 83 State of Madhya Pradesh v. Shaym Sunder Trivedi, (1995) 4 SCC 260 84 Shorter Oxford English Dictionary and Webster's Third International Dictionary 85 Henry Campbell Black, M.A. (Sixth Edn.). 86 AIR 1980 SC 785; See also Sunita Devi v. State of Bihar, AIR 2005 SC 498. 87 Roshan Beevi v. Joint Secy., Govt. of T.N., 1984 (15) ELT 289 (Mad.). 88 AIR 1970 Bom79; see also: State of Punjab v. Ajaib Singh, AIR 1953 SC 10 89 AIR 1994 SC 1775; see also: Nirmaljeet Kaur v. State of M.P. (2004) 7 SCC 558. 90 State of U.P. v. Mohd. Naim, AIR 1964 SC 703 91 AIR 2005 SC 2419; (See also: Dilip K. Basu v. State of W.B. & Ors. AIR 1997 SC 3017 and N.C. Dhoundial v. Union of India & Ors. AIR 2004 SC 127; Rubabbuddin Sheikh v. State of Gujarat & Ors. AIR 2010 SC 3175; Jaywant P. Sankpal v. Suman Gholap & Ors., (2010) 11 SCC 208; and Narmada Bai v. State of Gujarat & Ors., (2011) 5 SCC 79). 92 AIR 1981 SC 746 93 AIR 1990 SC 1480 94 (1994) 3 SCC 569 95 (2012)1SCC10. 96 AIR 1990 SC 709 97 AIR 2005 SC 402 98 AIR 2012 SC 2573 99 AIR1997 SC 3017 100 AIR 1997 SC 1739. 101 AIR 2006 SC 1117 102 AIR 1980 SC 1087 103 AIR 1985 SC 416 104 (2011) 6 SCC 189 105 (2011) 7 SCC 45 106 AIR 1964 SC 33. 107 (2011) 4 SCC 159 108 AIR 1978 SC 1025 109 AIR 1981 SC 928 110 India's Response against the act of Torture, available at: https://indialawyers.wordpress.com/2010/07/22/india%E2%80%99s-response-against-the-act-of-torture/ (visited on 26-10-2017). 111 AIR 1992 SC 1689 112 AIR 1977 SC 1579 113 (2012) 5 SCC 1 114 (2011) 6 SCC 369 115 (2015) 14 SCC 664 116 (2015) 14 SCC 543 117 AIR 1983 SC 378 118 Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity, available at: 119 (1869) 5 Bom HCR App A-1 120 AIR 1952 SC 933 121 AIR 1965 SC 1039 122 AIR 1983 SC 1086 123 AIR 2000 SC 2083 124 AIR 1993 SC 1960 125 See also: Suresh & Anr. v. State of Haryana , (2015) 2 SCC 227 126 Supra 127 (2015) 16 SCC 715 128 Vide: State of Rajasthan v. Vidyawati, AIR 1962 SC 993; Basava Kaum D. Patil v. State of Mysore, AIR 1977 SC 1749; Veena Sethi v. State of Bihar, AIR 1983 SC 339; Bhim Singh v. State of J & K, 1983 Supp. SCC 564; Sebastian M. Hongrav v. Union of India, AIR 1984 SC 571; Bhim Singh v. State of J&K, AIR 1986 SC 494; Saheli v. Commissioner of Police, A IR 1990 SC 513; Sube Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors., AIR 2006 SC 1117; and Dr. Mahmood Nayyar Azami v. State of Chattisgarh & Ors., AIR 2012 SC 2573. 129 AIR 2003 SC 4567. 130 1972 (1) All E.R. 1006. 131 AIR 2016 SC 2679 132 AIR 2004 SC 7 |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |