Indian Penal Code, 1860
92. Act done
in good faith for benefit of a person without consent
Nothing is an offence
by reason of any harm which it may cause to a person for whose benefit it is
done in good faith, even without that person's consent, if the circumstances are
such that it is impossible for that person to signify consent, or if that
person is incapable of giving consent, and has no guardian or other person in
lawful charge of him from whom it is possible to obtain consent in time for the
thing to be done with benefit:
Provisos- Provided -
First- That this
exception shall not extend to the intentional causing of death, or the
attempting to cause death;
Secondly- That this
exception shall not extend to the doing of anything which the person doing it knows
to be likely to cause death, for any purpose other than the preventing of death
or grievous hurt, or the curing of any grievous disease or infirmity;
Thirdly- That this
exception shall not extend to the voluntary causing of hurt, or to the
attempting to cause hurt, for any purpose other than the preventing of death or
hurt;
Fourthly- That this
exception shall not extend to the abetment of any offence, to the committing of
which offence it would not extend.
Illustrations
(a) Z is thrown from
his horse, and is insensible. A, a surgeon, finds that Z requires to be
trepanned. A, not intending Z's death, but in good faith, for Z's benefit,
performs the trepan before Z recovers his power of judging for himself. A has
committed no offence.
(b) Z is carried off
by a tiger. A fires at the tiger knowing it to be likely that the shot may kill
Z, but not intending to kill Z, and in good faith intending Z’s benefit. A's
ball gives Z a mortal wound. A has committed on offence.
(c) A, a surgeon, sees
a child suffer an accident which is likely to prove fatal unless an operation
be immediately performed. There is no time to apply to the child's guardian. A
performs the operation in spite of the entreaties of the child, intending, in
Good faith, the child's benefit. A has committed no offence.
(d) A is in a house
which is on fire, with Z, a child. People below hold out a blanket. A drops the
child from the housetop, knowing it to be likely that the fall may kill the
child, but not intending to kill the child, and intending, in good faith, the
child's benefit. Here, even if the child is killed by the fall, A has committed
no offence.
Explanation- Mere pecuniary benefit is not benefit within the meaning
of sections 88, 89 and-92.