Indian Evidence Act, 1872
91. Evidence of terms of contracts, grants and other
dispositions of property reduced to form of document
When the terms of a
contract, or of a grant, or of any other disposition of property, have been
reduced to the form of a document, and in all cases in which any matter is
required by law to be reduced to the form of a document, no evidence shall be
given in proof of the terms of such contract, grant or other disposition of
property, or of such matter, except the document itself, or secondary evidence
of its contents in cases in which secondary evidence is admissible under the
provisions hereinbefore contained.
Exception 1.– When a public
officer is required by law to be appointed in writing, and when it is shown
that any particular person has acted as such officer, the writing by which he
is appointed need not be proved.
Exception 2 .– Wills 75[
admitted to probate in 40[India] may be proved by the probate.
Explanation 1- This section applies
equally to cases in which the contracts grants or dispositions of property
referred to are contained in one document and to cases in which they are
contained in more documents than one.
Explanation 2- Where there are more
originals than one, one original only need be proved.
Explanation 3 .– The statement, in
any document whatever, of a fact other then the facts referred to in this
section, shall, not preclude the admission of oral evidence as to the same
fact.
Illustration
(a) If a contract be
contained in several letters, all the letters in which it is contained must be
proved.
(b) If a contract is
contained in a bill of exchange, the bill of exchange must be proved.
(c) If a bill of
exchange is drawn in set of three, one only need be proved.
(d) A contracts, in
writing, with B, for the delivery of indigo upon certain terms. The contract
mentions the fact that B had paid A the price of other indigo contracted for
verbally on another occasion.
Oral evidence is
offered that no payment was made for the other indigo. The evidence is
admissible.
(e) A gives B receipt
for money paid by B.
Oral evidence is
offered of the payment.
The evidence is
admissible.