Indian Evidence Act, 1872
43. Judgment, etc., other than those mentioned in sections
40 to 42, when relevant
Judgments, orders or
decrees, other than those mentioned in sections 40, 41 and 42, are irrelevant,
unless the existence of such judgment, order or decree, is a fact in issue, or
is relevant under some other provision of this Act.
Illustrations
(a) A and B separately
sue C for a libel which reflects upon each of them. C in each case says, that
the matter alleged to be libelous is true, and the circumstances are such that
it is probably true in each case, or in neither.
A obtains a decree
against C for damages on the ground that C failed to make out his
justification. The fact is irrelevant as between B and C.
(b) A prosecutes B for
adultery with C, A’s wife.
B denies that C is A’s
wife, but the Court convicts B of adultery.
Afterwards, C is
prosecuted for bigamy in marrying B during A’s lifetime. C says that she never
was A’s wife
The judgment against B
is irrelevant as against C.
(c) A prosecutes B for
stealing a cow from him, B is convicted.
A afterwards sues C
for the cow, which B had sold to him before his conviction. As between A and C,
the judgment against B is irrelevant.
(d) A has obtained a
decree for the possession of land against B, C, B’s son, murders A is
consequence.
The existence of the
judgment is relevant, as showing motive for a crime.
29 [(e) A is charged with
theft and with having been previously convicted of theft. The previous
conviction is relevant as a fact in issue.
(f) A is tried for the
murder of B. The fact that B prosecuted A for libel and that A was convicted
and sentenced is relevant under section 8 as showing the motive for the fact in
issue.