The Competition Act, 2002
Chapter II
Prohibition of Certain Agreements, Abuse of Dominant Position and Regulation of
Combinations Prohibition of Agreements
3. Anti-competitive
agreements.-
1.
No
enterprise or association of enterprises or person or association of persons
shall enter into any agreement in respect of production, supply, distribution,
storage, acquisition or control of goods or provision of services, which causes
or is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition within
India.
2.
Any
agreement entered into in contravention of the provisions contained in
sub-section (1) shall be void.
3.
Any
agreement entered into between enterprises or associations of enterprises or
persons or associations of persons or between any person and enterprise or
practice carried on, or decision taken by, any association of enterprises or
association of persons, including cartels, engaged in identical or similar
trade of goods or provision of services, which-
a. directly or
indirectly determines purchase or sale prices;
b. limits or controls
production, supply, markets, technical development, investment or provision of
services;
c. shares the market or
source of production or provision of services by way of allocation of
geographical area of market, or type of goods or services, or number of
customers in the market or any other similar way;
d. directly or
indirectly results in bid rigging or collusive bidding, shall be presumed to
have an appreciable adverse effect on competition: Provided that nothing
contained in this sub-section shall apply to any agreement entered into by way
of joint ventures if such agreement increases efficiency in production, supply,
distribution, storage, acquisition or control of goods or provision of
services.
Explanation.- For the
purposes of this sub-section, "bid rigging" means any agreement,
between enterprises or persons referred to in sub-section (3) engaged in
identical or similar production or trading of goods or provision of services,
which has the effect of eliminating or reducing competition for bids or
adversely affecting or manipulating the process for bidding.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Any
agreement amongst enterprises or persons at different stages or levels of the
production chain in different markets, in respect of production, supply,
distribution, storage, sale or price of, or trade in goods or provision of
services, including-
a. tie-in arrangement;
b. exclusive supply
agreement;
c. exclusive
distribution agreement;
d. refusal to deal;
e. resale price
maintenance, shall be an agreement in contravention of sub-section (1) if such
agreement causes or is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on
competition in India.
Explanation.-For the
purposes of this sub-section,-
a. "tie-in
arrangement" includes any agreement requiring a purchaser of goods, as a
condition of such purchase, to purchase some other goods;
b. "exclusive
supply agreement" includes any agreement restricting in any manner the
purchaser in the course of his trade from acquiring or otherwise dealing in any
goods other than those of the seller or any other person;
c. "exclusive
distribution agreement" includes any agreement to limit, restrict or
withhold the output or supply of any goods or allocate any area or market for
the disposal or sale of the goods;
d. "refusal to
deal" includes any agreement which restricts, or is likely to restrict, by
any method the persons or classes of persons to whom goods are sold or from
whom goods are bought;
e. "resale price
maintenance" includes any agreement to sell goods on condition that the
prices to be charged on the resale by the purchaser shall be the prices
stipulated by the seller unless it is clearly stated that prices lower than
those prices may be charged.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Nothing
contained in this section shall restrict-
i.
the
right of any person to restrain any infringement of, or to impose reasonable
conditions, as may be necessary for protecting any of his rights which have
been or may be conferred upon him under-
a. the Copyright Act, 1957
(14 of 1957);
b. the Patents Act, 1970
(39 of 1970);
c. the Trade and
Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (43 of 1958) or the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (47 of
1999);
d. the Geographical
Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 (48 of 1999);
e. the Designs Act, 2000
(16 of 2000);
f. the Semi-conductor
Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act, 2000 (37 of 2000);
i.
ii.
the
right of any person to export goods from India to the extent to which the
agreement relates exclusively to the production, supply, distribution or
control of goods or provision of services for such export. Prohibition of abuse
of dominant position