Companies Act, 2013
140.
Removal,
resignation of auditor and giving of special notice.
1. The auditor appointed
under section 139 may be removed from his office before the expiry of his term
only by a special resolution of the company, after obtaining the previous
approval of the Central Government in that behalf in the prescribed manner:
Provided
that before taking any action under this sub-section, the auditor concerned
shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
1.
2. The auditor who has
resigned from the company shall file within a period of thirty days from the
date of resignation, a statement in the prescribed form with the company and
the Registrar, and in case of companies referred to in sub-section (5 )
of section 139, the auditor shall also file such statement with the Comptroller
and Auditor-General of India, indicating the reasons and other facts as may be
relevant with regard to his resignation.
3. If the auditor does
not comply with sub-section (2 ), he or it shall be punishable with fine
which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to five
lakh rupees.
4.
i.
Special
notice shall be required for a resolution at an annual general meeting
appointing as auditor a person other than a retiring auditor, or providing
expressly that a retiring auditor shall not be re-appointed, except where the
retiring auditor has completed a consecutive tenure of five years or, as the
case may be, ten years, as provided under sub-section (2 ) of section
139.
ii.
On
receipt of notice of such a resolution, the company shall forthwith send a copy
thereof to the retiring auditor.
iii.
Where
notice is given of such a resolution and the retiring auditor makes with
respect thereto representation in writing to the company (not exceeding a
reasonable length) and requests its notification to members of the company, the
company shall, unless the representation is received by it too late for it to
do so,—
a.
in
any notice of the resolution given to members of the company, state the fact of
the representation having been made; and
b.
send
a copy of the representation to every member of the company to whom notice of
the meeting is sent, whether before or after the receipt of the representation
by the company, and if a copy of the representation is not sent as aforesaid
because it was received too late or because of the company’s default, the
auditor may (without prejudice to his right to be heard orally) require that
the representation shall be read out at the meeting:
Provided
that if a copy of representation is not sent as aforesaid, a copy thereof shall
be filed with the Registrar:
Provided
further that if the Tribunal is satisfied on an application either of the
company or of any other aggrieved person that the rights conferred by this
sub-section are being abused by the auditor, then, the copy of the
representation may not be sent and the representation need not be read out at
the meeting.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Without prejudice to
any action under the provisions of this Act or any other law for the time being
in force, the Tribunal either suo motu or on an application made to it
by the Central Government or by any person concerned, if it is satisfied that
the auditor of a company has, whether directly or indirectly, acted in a
fraudulent manner or abetted or colluded in any fraud by, or in relation to,
the company or its directors or officers, it may, by order, direct the company
to change its auditors:
Provided
that if the application is made by the Central Government and the Tribunal is
satisfied that any change of the auditor is required, it shall within fifteen
days of receipt of such application, make an order that he shall not function
as an auditor and the Central Government may appoint another auditor in his
place:
Provided
further that an auditor, whether individual or firm, against whom final order has
been passed by the Tribunal under this section shall not be eligible to be
appointed as
an
auditor of any company for a period of five years from the date of passing of
the order and the auditor shall also be liable for action under section 447.
Explanation
I .—It
is hereby clarified that the case of a firm, the liability shall be of the firm
and that of every partner or partners who acted in a fraudulent manner or
abetted or colluded in any fraud by, or in relation to, the company or its
director or officers.
Explanation
II .—For
the purposes of this Chapter the word “auditor” includes a firm of auditors.